In January 2023, the European Union (EU) published the
Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). The CSRD
aims to strengthen the rules regarding social and environmental
information that companies have to report on. In this regard, the
European Financial Reporting Advisory Group (EFRAG)
developed the European Sustainability Reporting Standards
(ESRS). The draft zstandards were introduced in November
2022. Subsequently, on 31 July 2023, the final text of the first set
of 12 ESRSs got issued.
The ESRSs are aligned with the reporting areas used in the
Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD)
recommendations. Further, many disclosure requirements are
similar to or based on the recommendations and the standards
developed by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI).
The diagram illustrates the 12 ESRSs issued:
(Source: Foundation for Audit Quality’s analysis, 2023 read with the ESRSs issued by the EFRAG in July 2023)
The following points explain some of the key aspects of the ESRSs:
-
Applicability and effective date:
ESRSs would be applicable to (group exceptions may apply):
-
Large EU companies which on the balance sheet date,
exceed two of the following three criteria (including EU and
non-EU subsidiaries):
- 250 employees, or
- Net revenue of EUR 40 million, or
- Total assets of EUR 20 million.Total assets of EUR 20 million.
-
Companies with listed securities on EU-regulated markets (except micro-undertakings), and
-
Ultimate non-EU parent companies with a combined group turnover in the EU of more than EUR 150 million.
The ESRSs would be applicable w.e.f. 1 January 2024.
However, they would apply in a phased manner, beginning with
the Public Interest Entities (PIEs) and companies with listed
securities on EU-regulated markets which are large and have
more than 500 employees.
-
Concept of double materiality: The standards provide that a
company should report sustainability matters based on the
concept of double materiality.
Double materiality refers to two dimensions of materiality –
‘financial5
Under the ESRSs, financial materiality would require disclosure of
sustainability-related matters that (may) trigger material financial effects on
a company’s development, such as cash flows, financial position or financial
performance in the short, medium or long term
’ and ‘impact6
Under the ESRSs, impact materiality would require disclosure of
sustainability-related matters that relate to a company’s
material actual or
potential, positive or negative
impacts on people or the environment over
the short, medium, or long term. Materiality would be assessed based on
severity and likelihood of the impact.
’
. Accordingly, companies are required
to perform materiality assessments for both the dimensions.
Therefore, a sustainability matter would meet the criterion of
double materiality if it is material from either of the dimension.
-
Materiality assessment test:
One of the important
aspects discussed in the standards is w.r.t. materiality
assessment test conducted by the companies. It provides
that:
-
Irrespective of the outcome of the materiality
assessment, a company should always disclose the
information required by ESRS 2
-
All other standards and individual disclosure
requirements and datapoints would be subject to
materiality assessment. But in cases wherein
companies conclude that ESRS E1 (climate change) is
not material, then they should provide a detailed
explanation of their conclusion
-
In case, a company concludes that a topic other than
climate change is not material and omits all the
disclosure requirements in the corresponding topical
ESRS, it may provide a brief explanation of the
conclusion of its materiality assessment for that
particular topic.
-
Reporting boundary: The ESRS reporting boundary is
based on the financial statements, i.e., the sustainability
statement would be prepared for the same reporting
company, as the financial statements. Further, while
preparing the sustainability statement, companies must
identify and report on material impacts, risks and
opportunities through their direct and indirect business
relationships in the
upstream and/or downstream value
chain.
-
Reporting timelines: It has been specified that companies
need to prepare a sustainability statement, including the
disclosures required by the ESRSs, as part of their
management report. The same needs to be published at the
same time as the financial statements.
-
Assurance:
CSRD requires assurance across all the topics
in the following manner:
-
FY24 (i.e., reporting in 2025): Limited assurance7
Limited assurance refers to a level of assurance at an acceptable level, that
based on professional judgement, is meaningful for the intended users. It
results in a negative conclusion
for certain large companies
-
FY25 (i.e., reporting in 2026):
Limited assurance for
other large companies
-
FY26 (i.e., reporting in 2027):
Limited assurance for
listed Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs).
Further, companies would be required to undertake
reasonable assurance8
Expressing reasonable assurance requires the assurance provider to
obtain sufficient appropriate evidence to conclude that the sustainability-related information is prepared, in all material respects, in accordance with
the applicable reporting criteria. It results in a positive conclusion.
from a future date in a gradual manner.
-
Phase-in reliefs: In order to reduce the reporting burden,
companies have been provided certain phase-in-reliefs.
These are:
-
For Year One (Y1) and Year Two (Y2)
-
Comparative information is not required to be
disclosed in Y1
-
All companies, regardless of their size, may opt out of
disclosing the expected financial impacts related to risks
from environmental issues in Y1. Companies can provide
qualitative disclosure only on these financial impacts for
further two years
-
Certain disclosures related to own workforce (social
protection, people with disabilities, work-related illnesses
and work-life balance) could be omitted in Y1
-
Companies with less than 750 employees may also omit:
-
The disclosure of Scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions
(ESRS E1) and other disclosures on their own
workforce (ESRS S1) in Y1, and
-
The disclosures on biodiversity (ESRS E4), workers in
the value chain (ESRS S2), affected communities
(ESRS S3) and consumers (ESRS S4) in Y1 and Y2.
-
For Y1, Y2 and Year Three (Y3)
-
Other available frameworks could be used to develop
relevant disclosures on material sustainability-related
matters, in advance of sector-specific standards
-
Information on value chain is not required to be estimated
and could be omitted, if the information is not available.
However, this relief is not applicable to data points
relevant for other EU laws or based on internal
information, and includes both upstream and
downstream information
Action Points for Auditors
-
Auditors should engage with the companies, falling
within the scope of the ESRS standards and understand
how the CSRD reporting requirements would impact
them and the group at large. Further, they should also
evaluate with the management, how the ESRSs
requirements would differ from the current level of
sustainability reporting by the companies
-
Since ESRSs take into account double-materiality
dimensions, it is possible that a particular subject
matter/criteria, which may not be material under the
extant financial materiality benchmark becomes material
under the ESRSs. Thus, auditors should evaluate the
impact of double materiality on the sustainability
disclosures made by companies under the ESRS
framework.
-
Practitioners may conduct pre readiness assessment
engagements to assess the control environment, data
quality and availability of sufficient documentation with
the companies in order to provide a limited assurance
on the sustainability information.